From attitude change to decision-making and moral behavior, the implications of cognitive dissonance continue to shape research and applications in psychology and beyond. Understanding cognitive dissonance not only helps us comprehend why we think and act the way we do but also offers practical strategies for promoting positive behavior change and personal growth. Cognitive dissonance is a powerful psychological phenomenon that influences our thoughts, decisions, and behaviors. From the discomfort caused by holding conflicting beliefs to the strategies we use to reduce dissonance, understanding cognitive dissonance provides valuable insights into the human experience. Recognizing the causes and effects of cognitive dissonance on mental health, as well as its role in decision-making and social psychology, can help us navigate the complexities of our beliefs and actions.
Cognitive Dissonance: An Exploration of Leon Festinger’s Theory
In the Cognitive Consequences of Forced Compliance (1959), the investigators asked students to spend an hour doing tedious tasks; e.g. turning pegs a quarter-turn, at fixed intervals. The tasks were designed to induce a strong, negative, mental attitude in the subjects. Once the subjects had done the tasks, the experimenters asked some subjects to speak with another new subject about the tasks. Unknown to the subjects, this new subject was actually a confederate (an actor) and part of the research team. The subjects were directed to persuade the confederate that the tedious tasks were interesting and engaging.
Sticking to Your Beliefs
According to this theory, when two actions or ideas are not psychologically consistent with each other, people do all in their power to change them until they become consistent. The discomfort is triggered by the person’s belief clashing with new information perceived, wherein they try to find a way to resolve the contradiction to reduce their discomfort. Rosenberg’s research precipitated a series of challenges and amendments to the original version of cognitive dissonance theory. Citing the central tenets of his self-perception theory, Bem challenged the entire notion of cognitive dissonance, and argued that the results of Festinger’s study could be explained more simply via the notion of inference. Just as we infer attitudes and opinions of other people from their behavior, so too do individuals infer their own attitudes and opinions from their own behavior. In other words, people don’t always have direct access to their own thoughts, but rather scan their past behavior in order to infer their own beliefs.
- To help give you the idea, here are some examples of situations in which you might feel cognitive dissonance.
- This includes “spreading apart the alternatives,” where a person increases the attractiveness of their chosen behavior and decreases the appeal of the rejected options or conflicting beliefs.
- Participants were then instructed to write a short essay in favour of the protection of the environment.
- Over a series of sessions, you and your therapist will work together to address obstacles and set goals aimed at personal growth and fulfillment.
- Many experiments have since been conducted to illustrate cognitive dissonance in more ordinary contexts.
- They didn’t have to resolve conflicting thoughts or alter their perception of reality because they knew they were only doing it for the money.
Motivational Interviewing and the Stages of Change
The first method is to adopt beliefs or ideas that help justify or explain away the conflict between beliefs or behaviours. Another technique is hiding one’s beliefs or behaviours from other people. Some also deal with dissonance by seeking only information that confirms their existing beliefs.
Harmonizing with reinforced beliefs
People begin to seek support from those who share similar views or try to convince others that the new information is inaccurate, looking cognitive dissonance and addiction for ways to justify behavior that goes against their beliefs. Such denial of cognitive dissonance may sound harmless at first – but unchecked avoidance has severe implications for individuals and those around them (Festinger, 1957). When people ignore, downplay, or forget about the inconsistencies within their beliefs and behaviors, it can lead to an inability to face reality. Experiencing cognitive dissonance can be a profoundly uncomfortable sensation, causing immense anxiety and potentially resulting in long-term stress or unhappiness (Montecinos, 2020). It either brings about distress or has the potential to trigger individualized defense mechanisms as a coping strategy.
Supporting fast fashion
However, your core beliefs contradict these instructions because you feel the project needs more testing to be safe or effective. You comply to avoid getting fired, even though you disagree with your decision. Ever wondered why we often make choices that leave us scratching our heads? The answer may lie in a fascinating psychological phenomenon known as cognitive dissonance. It can become problematic if it leads you to justify or rationalize behaviors that https://biobalancedorganics.com/sober-living-guide/ could be harmful. Or you may get caught up in trying to rationalize the dissonance to the point of stressing yourself out.
Consequently, when reviewing the main cognitive dissonance paradigms, Kenworthy et al. (2011) conclude that guilt could be the most important mediator of common cognitive dissonance effects. Depending on the paradigms used, anger and surprise are two other emotions that are likely to be confounded with cognitive dissonance (Geschwender, 1967; Noordewier & Breugelmans, 2013). While this particular debate is beyond the scope of this article, we invite consideration of the question. If the CDS is a specific state, then instruments should allow the CDS to be distinguished from other negative emotions. The four types of cognitive dissonance are belief disconfirmation, induced compliance, effort justification, and post-decisional dissonance. Understanding these can help you recognize the mental conflict that arises when our beliefs and behaviors do not align.
- Individuals may attempt to resolve this discomfort by changing their beliefs, altering their behaviors, or re-evaluating the importance of conflicting cognitions.
- The mind naturally seeks dissonance reduction, trying to ease the tension caused by conflicting thoughts.
- In politics, cognitive dissonance is often leveraged to sway public opinion.
Limits on the Evidences for Cognitive Dissonance Aversiveness
You’re always talking about how important it is to vote – even in the small local contests. For example, someone who believes in eating healthy may choose to eat dessert because they like dessert and eat healthy most of the time. “If Substance abuse you value eating healthy, then one day, decide to eat a doughnut, you might rationalize why eating that doughnut is OK even though it goes against your values of eating healthy,” shares Dr. Prewitt. In his book “A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance,” Festinger proposed that two ideas can be consonant or dissonant. By Kendra Cherry, MSEdKendra Cherry, MS, is a psychosocial rehabilitation specialist, psychology educator, and author of the “Everything Psychology Book.”
Leave a Reply